Primary sources first
For privacy, compliance, and documentation claims, we prefer regulators and original product documentation over summaries or review sites.
Fictional examples
Template examples are written for education and do not contain real client information, case material, or testimonials.
Limits stated plainly
We distinguish education from legal, compliance, and clinical advice and do not invent reviewer credentials or imply review that did not occur.
Dated and maintainable
Articles display publication and update dates. Fast-changing competitor and product claims are source-linked and scheduled for review.
Current review status
We do not currently claim a clinical reviewer
BeeThere’s public educational content is currently written and fact-checked by the BeeThere team, not reviewed by a named licensed clinician. Where a future article receives qualified clinical review, we will identify that reviewer, their relevant credentials, the review date, and the scope of review on the page.
Until then, clinicians should use our templates and guides as starting points, apply professional judgment, and follow the requirements of their license, setting, payer, jurisdiction, and organization.
Read the full Editorial PolicyRecent articles
Research from the team
AI & clinical documentation
Can AI Write Therapy Notes? Privacy, HIPAA & Judgment
A practical framework for deciding what AI should draft, what a clinician must verify, and which privacy questions to ask before protected health information enters a tool.
Documentation workflow
How to Write Therapy Progress Notes Faster
A faster note is not a shorter memory dump. Use a repeatable workflow that captures the clinical thread, chooses a structure, drafts once, and performs a focused review.